Skip to main content
File #: 23-560    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Business Item Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 6/22/2023 In control: City Council/Public Finance and Economic Development Authority/Parking Authority
On agenda: 11/6/2023 Final action:
Title: SUBJECT: Review and Discussion on a Potential Ordinance Regulating Vacant and/or Blighted Buildings REPORT IN BRIEF Review of ordinances from cities in California that set specific guidelines for vacant and blighted buildings. This includes specifications for safety hazards, security, and maintenance protocol. RECOMMENDATION Information only. Should the City Council want to take further action a separate agenda item will be prepared for consideration and possible action.
Attachments: 1. City of Fresno Ordinance, 2. City of El Monte Ordinance, 3. City of Richmond Ordinance, 4. City of San Joaquin Ordinance, 5. Vacant Building Presentation.pdf
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

 

Report Prepared by: Ellie Hamm, Intern, Planning Division, Scott McBride, Acting City Manager.

 

Title

SUBJECT: Review and Discussion on a Potential Ordinance Regulating Vacant and/or Blighted Buildings

 

REPORT IN BRIEF

Review of ordinances from cities in California that set specific guidelines for vacant and blighted buildings. This includes specifications for safety hazards, security, and maintenance protocol.

 

RECOMMENDATION

Information only. Should the City Council want to take further action a separate agenda item will be prepared for consideration and possible action.

 

Body

CITY COUNCIL PRIORITIES

Downtown and Economic Development (A.3)

Public Works and City Beautification (C.2)

 

DISCUSSION

As part of the City Council 2023-2024 Goals and Priorities the goals “explore citywide vacant building ordinance options” (Downtown and Economic Development, a.3) and to “explore vacant building ordinance” (Public Works and City Beautification, c.2) were approved by the City Council. This is clearly an important goal, as it is mentioned twice in the Council’s Goals and Priorities.

 

Many cities across California have adopted ordinances to deal with the issues related to h vacant and blighted buildings.  Those include public safety, homeless inhabitation, graffiti, and disturbance of community aesthetic.  Staff has reviewed a few ordinances which are attached to this administrative report.

 

In summary these are noted in the sample ordnances:

 

The City of Fresno has adopted an ordinance that defines a maintenance protocol to be followed as well as security measures and the removal of safety hazards.

 

In the City of El Monte, all vacant buildings must be boarded up within a specific timeframe of their becoming vacant. If the property owner does not do this in a timely matter, the city will do it for them in exchange for a fee. They have also implemented a monitoring fee for vacant nuisance properties.

 

The City of Richmond has a code that must be followed by the property owner. With some exceptions, buildings cannot be vacant for more than 30 days. A permit is required to board property.

The City of San Joaquin requires that all vacant properties be recorded with the city within 30 days of vacation. Their code includes a fee that is enacted if there is any violation, and the property cannot be inhabited until all fines are paid off.

 

These are just some examples, and while all of them may not be viable in this community, some policy options from these or other examples may assist in achieving the intent of the City Council. Enacting a vacant /blighted building ordinance would potentially aid in public safety, but also keep current blighted buildings from falling into worse condition. Enforcement is usually through a city’s Code Enforcement operations with support from other departments.

 

ATTACHMENTS

1.  City of Fresno Ordinance

2.  City of El Monte Ordinance

3.  City of Richmond Ordinance

4.  City of San Joaquin Ordinance

5.  Presentation on Vacant Buildings