Skip to main content
File #: 20-298    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Consent Item Status: Passed
File created: 6/8/2020 In control: City Council/Public Finance and Economic Development Authority/Parking Authority
On agenda: 7/6/2020 Final action: 7/6/2020
Title: SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolution Declaring the Intent to Vacate a 315-Square-Foot Excess Portion of an Alley to the Adjacent Property at 1001 W. 16th Street, Generally Located on the Northwest Corner of 16th Street and Q Street, and Setting a Public Hearing for August 3, 2020, (Vacation #20-03) REPORT IN BRIEF Considers the abandonment of a City easement at 1001 W. 16th Street. RECOMMENDATION City Council - Adopt a motion adopting Resolution 2020-43, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Merced, California, declaring its intention to vacate a 315-square-foot excess portion of an alley to the adjacent property at 1001 W. 16th Street, generally located at the northwest corner of 16th Street and Q Street (Vacation #20-03) and setting time and place for Public Hearing.
Attachments: 1. Location Map.pdf, 2. Legal Description.pdf, 3. Parcel Map.pdf, 4. Draft City Council Resolution 2020-43.pdf

 

Report Prepared by: Francisco Mendoza-Gonzalez, Associate Planner, Development Services

 

Title

SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolution Declaring the Intent to Vacate a 315-Square-Foot Excess Portion of an Alley to the Adjacent Property at 1001 W. 16th Street, Generally Located on the Northwest Corner of 16th Street and Q Street, and Setting a Public Hearing for August 3, 2020, (Vacation #20-03)

 

REPORT IN BRIEF

Considers the abandonment of a City easement at 1001 W. 16th Street.

 

RECOMMENDATION

City Council - Adopt a motion adopting Resolution 2020-43, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Merced, California, declaring its intention to vacate a 315-square-foot excess portion of an alley to the adjacent property at 1001 W. 16th Street, generally located at the northwest corner of 16th Street and Q Street (Vacation #20-03) and setting time and place for Public Hearing.

 

Body

ALTERNATIVES

1.  Approve, as recommended by staff; or,

2.  Approve, subject to modifications as conditioned by Council; or,

3.  Deny based on specific findings; or,

4.  Refer back to staff for reconsideration of specific items as requested by Council; or,

5.  Continue to a future meeting (date and time to be specified in Council motion).

 

AUTHORITY

Part 3, Chapter 3 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California authorizes the City Council to vacate a right-of-way or easement.  The vacation shall be made by adoption of a resolution pursuant to Section 8335 of the Code, and shall be recorded pursuant to Section 8336.  The City of Merced Administrative Policies and Procedures No. A-6 provides direction to staff for processing vacation requests, and City Resolution 86080 establishes a policy concerning costs associated with the vacation.

 

CITY COUNCIL PRIORITIES

Not applicable.

 

DISCUSSION

Request

 

The subject site is adjacent to a vacant 0.33-acre parcel zoned Central Commercial (C-C) located at the northwest corner of 16th Street and Q Street (Attachment 1). Adjacent to the vacant parcel within the alley is an area that is 63 feet wide by 5 feet long, located near the northeast portion of the parcel. The applicant is requesting the vacation of this area so that they may develop a gas station on this site. This proposed gas station would go before the Site Plan Review Committee so that they may assess the proposed site plan and elevations (design review would be considered as the subject site is within the City’s Design Review Boundary) to ensure the project meets City standards, and provides adequate access to the City’s safety divisions/Refuse Department.

 

The City’s Engineering Department reviewed this proposal, and could not determine the original purpose of this area or find any specific project that it was reserved for. However, the City’s Engineering Department determined that this area would not be needed for any future City-related projects. The City’s Engineering Department recommends vacating this area to give the property owner full rights to develop their land. If the City needs additional easements on this property, they can be requested when the property owner submits land use applications to develop this site.

 

After contacting all utility companies in the area, it was determined that no utilities were located within this area, and there are no plans to use this area in the future. Therefore, this area is no longer needed and should be abandoned to give the property owners full use of their property.  The General Plan does not address the abandonment of excess portions of alleys; and thus, this action does not conflict with any General Plan policies, text, or maps, so it can be considered “consistent.”

 

History and Past Actions

 

At the Planning Commission meeting of June 17, 2020, the Planning Commission reviewed the vacation for consistency with the City’s General Plan and found, by unanimous vote of those present, that the proposed vacation does not conflict with any General Plan policies, text, or maps, and is, therefore, consistent with the General Plan.

 

Recommendation

 

Staff is recommending the adoption of the Resolution at Attachment 4 to set a public hearing for August 3, 2020, to vacate the area as described above.

 

IMPACT ON CITY RESOURCES

The approval of the requested vacation would not result in any impacts on City resources.

 

ATTACHMENTS

1.  Location Map

2.  Legal Description

3.  Parcel Map

4.  Draft City Council Resolution 2020-43