Skip to main content
File #: 25-839    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Consent Item Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 9/8/2025 In control: City Council/Public Finance and Economic Development Authority/Parking Authority
On agenda: 9/15/2025 Final action:
Title: SUBJECT: Authorization for Payment of Litigation Costs in Connection with the Retainer Agreement with Marderosian and Cohen for 2023 Flood Litigation REPORT IN BRIEF On July 3, 2023, the City Council approved a Retainer Agreement with Marderosian and Cohen to represent the City in litigation seeking recovery of damages against California Department of Fish and Wildlife (23CV-03845) related to the January 2023 flooding events emanating from Bear Creek and other related creeks, rivers, channels, and flood control and irrigation facilities located in Merced County, California. The case is now scheduled for trial on January 27, 2026. After further review of the original approvals, staff identified that while the Retainer Agreement was authorized, litigation costs were not included in that authorization. Staff is therefore requesting Council approval to pay litigation costs associated with the representation. To date, the City has incurred approximately $175,000 in litigation costs, pri...
Attachments: 1. Legal Services Agreement – Marderosian & Cohen
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

Report Prepared by: Craig J. Cornwell, City Attorney

 

Title

SUBJECT: Authorization for Payment of Litigation Costs in Connection with the Retainer Agreement with Marderosian and Cohen for 2023 Flood Litigation

 

REPORT IN BRIEF

On July 3, 2023, the City Council approved a Retainer Agreement with Marderosian and Cohen to represent the City in litigation seeking recovery of damages against California Department of Fish and Wildlife (23CV-03845) related to the January 2023 flooding events emanating from Bear Creek and other related creeks, rivers, channels, and flood control and irrigation facilities located in Merced County, California.

The case is now scheduled for trial on January 27, 2026. After further review of the original approvals, staff identified that while the Retainer Agreement was authorized, litigation costs were not included in that authorization. Staff is therefore requesting Council approval to pay litigation costs associated with the representation.

To date, the City has incurred approximately $175,000 in litigation costs, primarily related to deposition expenses and expert witness retainer agreements. Staff anticipates an additional $175,000 in costs through trial.

 

RECOMMENDATION

City Council - Adopt a motion:

 

A.  Authorizing the City to pay litigation costs incurred to date, estimated at approximately $175,000, related to the representation by Marderosian & Cohen; and,

 

B.  Authorizing the City to pay additional litigation costs anticipated to be incurred through trial, estimated at approximately $175,000; and,

 

C.  Authorizing the City Manager to execute any necessary documents related to the payment of these litigation costs.

 

Body

ALTERNATIVES

1.  Approve, as recommended by staff; or,

2.  Approve, subject to conditions other than as recommended by staff; or,

3.  Deny; or,

4.  Continue to a future meeting.

 

AUTHORITY

Charter of the City of Merced, Section 200.

 

CITY COUNCIL PRIORITIES

As provided for in the 2025-26 Adopted Budget.

 

DISCUSSION

On July 3, 2023, the City Council approved a Retainer Agreement with Marderosian & Cohen to represent the City in litigation arising out of the January 2023 Flood Event. The litigation is advancing and is now scheduled for trial on January 27, 2026.

Following a closer review of the original Council action, staff identified that while the agreement itself was authorized, approval for payment of litigation costs was not included. Such costs are necessary to support the litigation, including depositions, expert witnesses, document preparation, and trial-related expenses.

To date, the City has incurred approximately $175,000 in costs. These expenses have included deposition costs and expert retainer agreements necessary to advance the case. Looking ahead, staff anticipates an additional $175,000 in costs through trial.

Approval of this request will both ratify the litigation costs already incurred and authorize payment of the additional costs expected through trial, allowing the City to continue pursuing recovery of damages.

 

IMPACT ON CITY RESOURCES

Funding for these anticipated litigation costs are available within the Waste Water Systems Operations fiscal year 25-26 operating budget.

 

ATTACHMENTS

1.  Legal Services Agreement – Marderosian & Cohen