Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Bookmark and Share
File #: 19-178    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Consent Item Status: Passed
File created: 4/1/2019 In control: City Council/Public Finance and Economic Development Authority/Parking Authority
On agenda: 4/15/2019 Final action: 4/15/2019
Title: SUBJECT: Second Reading - Adoption of Ordinance No. 2500 Approving Site Utilization Plan Revision #6 to Planned Development (P-D) #46 REPORT IN BRIEF Adoption of previously introduced Ordinance 2500 approving Site Utilization Plan revision #6 to Planned Development (P-D) #46. RECOMMENDATION City Council - Adopt a motion adopting Ordinance 2500, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Merced, California, approving Site Utilization Plan Revision #6 to Planned Development (P-D) #46 changing the land use designation from "Business Park" (BP) to "High-Medium Density Residential" (HMD) for 10.73 acres of land, generally located on the west side of San Augustine Avenue at Pacific Drive.
Attachments: 1. Ordinance

 

Report Prepared by: Julie Nelson, Associate Planner, Development Services Department

 

Title

SUBJECT: Second Reading - Adoption of Ordinance No. 2500 Approving Site Utilization Plan Revision #6 to Planned Development (P-D) #46

 

REPORT IN BRIEF

Adoption of previously introduced Ordinance 2500 approving Site Utilization Plan revision #6 to Planned Development (P-D) #46.

 

RECOMMENDATION

City Council - Adopt a motion adopting Ordinance 2500, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Merced, California, approving Site Utilization Plan Revision #6 to Planned Development (P-D) #46 changing the land use designation from “Business Park” (BP) to “High-Medium Density Residential” (HMD) for 10.73 acres of land, generally located on the west side of San Augustine Avenue at Pacific Drive.

 

Body

ALTERNATIVES

1.  Approve the Ordinance, as recommended the Planning Commission and staff; or,

2.  Deny; or,

4.  Refer to staff for reconsideration of specific items (to be addressed in the motion); or,

5.  Continue to a future City Council meeting (date and time to be specified in the motion).

 

AUTHORITY

Title 19 of the Merced Municipal Code outlines environmental review procedures and California Government Code Section 65358 (a) grants the authority to amend all or part of an adopted General Plan.  The legislative body may amend the zoning pursuant to California Government Code Section 65583.

 

DISCUSSION

The proposed project site is approximately 10.73 acres and is located on the west side of San Augustine Avenue at Pacific Drive.  The proposal would allow the change in the General Plan Land Use designation from Business Park (BP) to High Medium Density Residential (HMD), a revision to the Fahrens Creek Specific Plan, and a Site Utilization Plan Revision to Planning Development (P-D) #46 changing the land use designation for both the Specific Plan and the Site Utilization Plan from “mini-storage” to “multi-family.”  The proposed changes would allow the construction of an apartment complex, a community building, swimming pool, children’s play area, dog park, and associated parking for the complex.

 

The proposed apartment complex was originally supposed to consist of 176 units with a mixture of one and two bedroom apartments within 24 buildings.  However, in order to accommodate a Fire Lane as required by the Fire Department, the site plan was revised and the total number of units decreased to 164 units.  In order to allow flexibility in their design, the Planning Commission and Planning staff have recommended the project be approved to construct between 164 and 176 units.    Allowing the range of units between 164 and 176 provides additional flexibility in their site design.  However, the fire lane must be included in any design they choose to move forward with for final approval.  

 

The current plans include two building types - Building A and Building B.  Each Building A would be a two-story building with a total of 8 units per building consisting of a mixture of one and two bedroom units.  Each Building B would also be a two-story building with four units per building consisting of only two bedroom units.  Building elevations and floor plans are included with Attachments 3 and 4.  The developer is continuing to refine the plans for this project and may add a third building type that would include a six-unit building. 

 

Site Design

 

The project site is bounded on the east by San Augustine Avenue and on the west by SR 59.  Access is prohibited to SR 59, except for an Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA).  All access to the site is off of San Augustine Avenue. 

 

The project site is somewhat unique in that it has PG&E transmission towers running through the site approximately 65 to 70 feet south of the northern property line.  PG&E restricts the types of uses that can be placed underneath the power lines and transmission towers.  Parking is typically allowed underneath the power lines and around the towers, but buildings would not be allowed.  Condition #23 of Planning Commission Resolution #4013 requires written documentation from PG&E allowing the parking underneath the power lines. 

 

Given the location of the power lines, the site is very challenging to develop either as commercial or multi-family.  The proposed project keeps the buildings as far away as possible from the residential, but does place the parking underneath he power lines making them closer to the residential uses.  An approximately 10-foot-wide drainage swale is located along the northern property line.  The drive aisle for entering the site is adjacent to the drainage swale and is approximately 30 feet wide, putting the first row of parking spaces approximately 40 feet from the property line.

 

Traffic/Circulation

 

The project site is located on the west side of San Augustine Avenue at Pacific Drive.  The site abuts SR 59 to the west.  San Augustine Avenue and Pacific Drive are both designated as Collector Roads on the City’s Circulation Plan.  San Augustine Avenue connects to Yosemite Avenue (an arterial roadway) approximately one-quarter mile south of the project site.  Pacific Drive connects to R Street (an arterial roadway) just over one-half mile east of the project site.  Access to the project site would be from San Augustine Avenue with an entrance only driveway providing access into the site and an exit-only driveway leaving the site.

 

The intersection of Yosemite Avenue and San Augustine Avenue would be signalized in the future (this development is conditioned to pay a percentage of the cost for this traffic signal).  Currently, the intersection has a four-way stop. 

 

Access from Pacific Drive onto R Street would allow right turns only.  A U-turn could be made at Yosemite Avenue.  However, R Street currently dead-ends just north of Pacific Drive.  In the future, R Street would be extended north to Bellevue Road and ultimately further north to the end of the City Limit. 

 

Access to Yosemite Avenue could also be made using El Redondo Drive and Compass Pointe Avenue.  El Redondo Drive is a north/south collector road approximately one-quarter mile east of the site off of Pacific Drive.  The intersection of El Redondo Drive and Yosemite Avenue is signalized.  Compass Pointe Avenue is approximately one-half mile from the site and is also a collector road.  Access to Yosemite Avenue at this intersection is restricted to right-turns only. 

 

San Augustine Avenue will eventually extend north to intersect with Cardella Road which would provide additional access to the north, east, and west. 

 

In addition to the Class I bike path near the site, Class III bicycle lanes are provided on San Augustine Avenue, Pacific Drive, El Redondo Drive, Yosemite Avenue, and R Street.  There is also a bus stop located at El Redondo Drive and Aurora Drive less than one-quarter mile from the project site. 

 

The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Rates Manual (8th Edition) is used to estimate the number of trips generated by a particular use.  The Manual lists the number of estimated average daily trips (ADT’s) based on the total gross square feet of storage area.  Based on an analysis of other mini-storage facilities within the City, the average square feet of storage area per acre is approximately 21,000 square feet.  Using this factor, the 10.83-acre project site could accommodate approximately 227,430 square feet of storage area.  Based on this calculation, the total ADT’s for a mini-storage use at this location would be 569 average daily trips.  In comparison, the proposed apartment project would generate 1,170 ADT’s.  However, given the proximity of the project site to a bus stop and easy access to bicycle lanes, it’s expected that the total ADT’s would be reduced by at least 10%.  Additionally, given the fact that the project is adjacent to two collector streets which provide easy access to arterial roadways, the additional traffic is not expected to have a significant impact to the area. 

 

Parking

 

Parking for multi-family dwellings is calculated based on the number of units, the number of bedrooms, and the number of bathrooms per the Zoning Ordinance.  The total number of spaces required for the apartment complex would be 272 spaces (based on 176 units).  As proposed, the site would provide 296 stalls.

 

The majority of the parking for the project would be provided on the north side of the apartment buildings, underneath the PG&E power lines.  No structures could be built in this area, therefore, the parking spaces would be uncovered.  However, consistent with City Standards for Parking Lots and as required by Condition #30, parking lot trees would be required at a ratio of one tree for every six parking spaces.    There are a few parking spaces that would be closer to the buildings which could possibly be covered.  This area would accommodate the required handicap accessible parking stalls in addition to about 40 other stalls.

 

Neighborhood Impact

 

The proposed land use change and subsequent apartment complex would increase the number of people in the area as well as the traffic in the area.  However, as previously described, given the project location and easy access to collector and arterial streets, as well as public transit and bicycle lanes, the traffic is not expected to over-burden the area. 

 

Additional light and glare would be created from the site.  Condition #34 requires that all exterior lighting be oriented so that it does not spillover onto adjacent properties.  As previously described, the parking spaces would be at least 40 feet from the property line of the adjacent residential uses.  Any light standards would typically be placed in the middle of the parking area which would make them approximately 60 feet from the property line.  With the implementation of Condition #34, light and glare from the project should not impact the adjacent dwellings any more than a commercial development would if the site were developed under the current land use designations.

 

The project would introduce new noise sources to the area.  Vehicles would be entering and leaving the site on a regular basis via the drive way on San Augustine Avenue.  The entrance side of the drive aisle would be approximately 10 feet from the northern property line and approximately 20 to 30 feet from the residences.  A typical residence is set back 20 feet from a street. 

 

The two-story apartment buildings would be approximately 120 feet from the residential properties to the north.  There are several two-story homes along the northern property line, facing La Sierra Court.  All of the adjacent homes to the north have at least a ten-foot setback from the rear property line, bringing the distance between the closest apartment building to 130 feet.  The homes along Pacific Drive are slightly closer at 100 feet away, but have a collector street separating them from the apartments which would help reduce any potential impacts.

 

Land Use/Density Issues

 

The project site is currently designated on the General Plan Land Use Diagram as Business Park and is shown as “Mini-Storage” on the Fahrens Creek Specific Plan and the Site Utilization Plan for Planned Development (P-D #46).  According to the General Plan, a Business Park designation is “to provide areas for a mix of commercial, office, and industrial uses with shared access and parking facilities.  Uses could include a wide variety of light manufacturing, warehousing, office, research and development, and service business activities.”

 

According to the City’s Zoning Ordinance, residential uses would not be allowed within a Business Park (B-P) zone.  Principally permitted uses include parking facilities, research and development, reverse vending machines (recycling facilities), and other similar uses.  The Zoning Ordinance also lists a variety of uses that would be allowed with Conditional Use Permit or Site Plan Review approval.

 

The Zoning Ordinance also has parking and development standards for commercial uses adjacent to a residential uses.  Section 20.38 I (2) (c) requires commercial parking lots abutting residential zoning districts to have a solid wall with a minimum height of 6 feet.  However, there are no parking standards for multi-family uses adjacent to single-family uses.

 

The proposed General Plan land use designation change to High/Medium Density (HMD) Residential allows 12 to 24 units per acres.  The proposal of 176 units would have a density of 16 units per acre and if the project is reduced to 164 units, the density would be 15 units per acre.  The density from both scenarios fall within the allowable density for the General Plan designation of High/Medium Density (HMD) Residential and would be compatible with the nearby residential uses. 

 

Environmental Clearance

 

The Planning staff has conducted an environmental review (Initial Study # 18-60) of the project in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and a Draft Negative Declaration (i.e., no significant adverse environmental effects have been found) is being recommended.

 

Planning Commission Action

 

The Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on this matter on January 23, 2019.  At the meeting, the project proponent spoke in favor of the project and no one spoke in opposition.  The Planning Commission voted 7 ayes, 0 noes, to recommend approval of Environmental Review #18-60, General Plan Amendment #18-03, Revision #4 to the Fahrens Creek Specific Plan, and Site Utilization Plan Revision #6 to Planned Development (P-D) #46.

 

City Council Action

 

At the City Council meeting of March 18, 2019, the City Council held a public hearing on this matter.  At that time, Fong Xiong, a neighboring property owner, provided testimony regarding concern about the separation between the single-family residential to the north and the proposed multi-family project.  Mr. Xiong cited concerns related to security and noise and requested that the City Council add a condition requiring a block wall along the northern edge of the project to separate the single-family homes from the proposed multi-family project.  In addition to Mr. Xiong’s testimony, the City Council also received a letter from another neighbor, Stacey Wiebe, echoing Mr. Xiong’s concerns.  The City Council discussed the request for a block wall and determined that a block wall should be installed to protect the single-family residential uses to the north.  Therefore, the following condition was added to the Conditions of Approval found at Attachment C of City Council Resolution No. 2018-09:

 

39)                     A 6-foot-tall concrete block wall shall be constructed along the norther property line adjacent to the twenty-two existing homes on La Sierra Street.

 

IMPACT ON CITY RESOURCES

As a condition of approval, the project would be required to annex into the City’s Community Facilities District (CFD) for services.  Once building permits are issued for construction of the project, the City would be able to begin collecting funds to cover the costs of Police and Fire protection, landscape maintenance (in the public right-of-way), storm drain maintenance, and the costs for street lights.

 

ATTACHMENTS

1.  Ordinance 2500